Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Peralta v. California Franchise Tax Board, No. 16-1820 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1820
Decided
December 9, 2016
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellant Leslie Ann Pera lta appeals the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Cal i- fornia (“District Court”) dismissing various federal and state law claims for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rule s of Civil Procedure. See Peralta v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. , 124 F. Supp. 3d 993 , 995 (N.D. Cal. 2015). We affirm. BACKGROUND Ms. Peralta is the inventor of U.S. Patent No. 7,584,129 (“the ’129 patent”).