Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

NantKwest, Inc. v. Iancu, No. 16-1794 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1794
Decided
July 27, 2018
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
53 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

When the United States Patent and Trademark O f- fice’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirms an examiner’s rejection of a patent application, § 145 of the Patent Act permits the disappointed applicant to cha l- lenge the Board’s decision in district court. Applicants who invoke § 145 are required by statute to pay “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings” incurred by t he U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“ PTO”) in defending the Board’s decision, regardless of the outcome.