Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Clarilogic, Inc. v. FormFree Holdings Corporation, No. 16-1781 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1781
Decided
March 15, 2017
Judge
Reyna, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

FormFree Holdings Corporation (“FormFree”) appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California’s grant of Clarilogic, Inc.’s (“Clarilo- gic”) summary judgment motion holding that the claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,762,243 (“the ’243 patent”) are ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. B ecause the ’243 patent’s claims are directed to an abstract idea and the claims contain no additional elements that transform the nature of the claims into a patent -eligible application of the abstract idea, we affirm.