Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Braintree Labs. v. Breckenridge Pharm., No. 16-1731 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2017)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1731
Decided
May 5, 2017
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Braintree Laboratories, Inc. (“Braintree”) appeals from the Southern District of New York’s summary judg- ment that Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Brecke n- ridge”) does not directly infringe or induce infringement of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,946,149 (“the ’149 patent”). For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand. BACKGROUND The ’149 patent is directed to compositions and met h- ods for purging a patient’s colon, as is routinely performed prior to a colonoscopy.