Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., No. 16-1456 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1456
Also Docketed
No. 16-1457 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
March 6, 2017
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The jury in this case found Sprint Spectrum L.P . lia- ble to Prism Technologies LLC for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155. The jury awarded Prism $30 million in reasonable-royalty damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284. The district court denied Sprint’s post - trial motions, and it also denied Prism’s motion for addi- tional monetary relief for times after the period Prism said was covered by the jury verdict . Sprint appeals, and Prism cross-appeals. We affirm.