Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications International, No. 16-1449 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 5, 2017)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1449
Decided
January 5, 2017
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. (“Sonix”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment following its determination that claims 9, 25, 35–36, 52–55, 57–60, 62– 64, 66, 68, 71– 77, 79– 82, and 85–90 (“the asserted claims”) of Sonix’s U.S. Patent 7,328,845 (“the ’845 p a- tent”) are invalid as indefinite . See Sonix Tech. Co. v . Publ’ns. Int’l, Ltd. , No. 13 -cv-2082, 2015 WL 8153600, at *9–17 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 8. 2015) (“Opinion”).