Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., No. 16-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 5, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1308
Decided
July 5, 2016
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This appeal involves an action brought by Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing Limited (collectively Amgen) AMGEN INC. v. APOTEX INC. 3 against Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. (collectively Apotex) under the Biologics Price Competition and Inn ovation Act of 2009 (Biologics Act or BPCIA ). Apotex has an applic a- tion pend ing with the Food and Drug Admi nistration, filed under the Biologics Act, that seeks permission to begin marketing a product allegedly “biosimilar” to Amgen’s FDA -approved Neulasta®.