Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Evolutionary Intelligence LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, No. 16-1188 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2017)

Affirmed
§ 101 Eligibility
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1188
Also Docketed
No. 16-1190, No. 16-1191, No. 16-1192, No. 16-1194, No. 16-1195, No. 16-1197, No. 16-1198, No. 16-1199 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 17, 2017
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC (“EI”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, concluding that all claims of U.S. P atents 7,010,536 (“the ’536 patent”) and 7,702,682 (“the ’682 patent”) ( collectively, “ the asserted patents”) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 10 1. See Evolu- tionary Intelligence, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corp. , 137 F. Supp. 3d 1157 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (“Decision”).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error