AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, LLC, No. 16-1126 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2016)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
AngioScore, Inc. sued the defendant -appellants ( Tri- Reme Medical, LLC , Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd., QT Vascular L td., and Eitan Konstantino ) for patent i n- fringement, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting, and unfair competition. After separate trials on the patent and state -law claims, the district court entered final judgment for Defendants on the patent claim , for AngioScore on the state-law claims, and denied Corporate Defendants’ (TriReme Medical, LLC , Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd., and QT V ascul…
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error