Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., No. 16-1077 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1077
Decided
March 7, 2017
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively, “IV”) appeal from a final decision of the United States District Court for the District of Mary- land finding all claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,984,081 (“’081 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,546,002 (“’002 patent”) ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and barring IV from pursuing its infringement claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,715,084 (“’084 patent”) under a collateral estoppel (issue preclusion) theory.1 For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.