Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC, No. 16-1047 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 25, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1047
Also Docketed
No. 16-1101 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 25, 2017
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The district court awarded Octane Fitness, LLC a t- torney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 after finding the case exceptional. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in its exceptionality finding or in the amount of the fee award, we affirm. I ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Octane are compet i- tors in the exercise equipment ind ustry. ICON initially filed suit in the Central District of California against Octane and Nellie’s Exercise Equipment. ICON alleged that Octane infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,019,710 and both parties infringed U .S.