Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Impulse Technology Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 16-1015 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1015
Decided
December 7, 2016
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Impulse Technology Ltd. (“Impulse”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Delaware, granting Microsoft Corporation’s (“Mi- crosoft”) motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of fourteen of the fifteen asserted claims across U.S. Patent s 6,308,565 (“the ’565 patent”), 6,430,997 (“the ’997 patent”), 6,765,726 (“the ’726 p a- tent”), 6,876,496 (“the ’496 patent”), 7,359,121 (“the ’121 patent”), and 7,791,808 (“the ’808 patent”) (collectively, the “asserted patents”) . See Impulse Tech. Ltd. v.