Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Communication Company, No. 16-1013 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 23, 2016)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1013
Decided
September 23, 2016
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Sprint Communication C ompany LP and its affiliates (collectively, “Sprint”) appeal from a final decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware finding that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,452,932; 6,463,052; 6,633,561; 7,286,561; 6,298,064; and 6,473,429 (collectively, “the asserted patents”) are invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2.