Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 15-2021 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-2021
Also Docketed
No. 15-2022, No. 15-2023, No. 15-2024, No. 15-2025, No. 15-2026, No. 15-2028, No. 15-2031, No. 15-2033, No. 15-2034, No. 15-2035, No. 15-2041, No. 15-2042, No. 15-2046, No. 15-2047, No. 15-2049, No. 15-2059, No. 15-2060, No. 16-1025, No. 16-1060, No. 16-1117, No. 16-1118 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 16, 2018
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grünenthal GmbH sued generic drug manufacturers under the Hatch - Waxman Act in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement of, among other patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,309,122 B2 and 8,329,216 B2. 1 These patents relate to a controlled re- 1 We grant the motions to voluntarily dismiss a p- peal nos. 15-2022, 15-2023, 15-2025, 15-2028, 15-2033, 15- 2034, 15- 2035, 15- 2041, 15 -2042, 15- 2047, 15- 2049, 15- 2059, 15-2060, and 16-1118.