Stanford University v. The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong, No. 15-2011 (Fed. Cir. June 27, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (“Stanford”) appeals from order s of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in three interference proceedings between Stanford and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (“CUHK”). In all of these proceedings, t he Board found that Stanford’s claims were unpatentable for lack of written description. See Quake v. Lo, No. 105,920 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 7, 2014); Lo v. Quake , No. 105,923 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 7, 2014); Lo v. Quake , No. 105,924 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 7, 2014).