Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

GE Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Lighting Science Group, No. 15-1980 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 27, 2016)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1980
Also Docketed
No. 15-1981, No. 15-1982, No. 15-2044 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
October 27, 2016
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GE Lighting Solutions sued Defenda nts for infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 6,787,999 and 6,799,864—two patents directed to dissipating heat from light emitting diode lamps. The district court correctly found the asserted ’864 patent claims indefinite, but erroneously determined that the asserted ’999 patent claims a re indefinite. According- ly, we affirm -in-part, reverse -in-part, and remand for further proceedings. GE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, LLC v. LIGHTS OF AMERICA, INC.