UCB, Inc. v. Yeda Research and Development, No. 15-1957 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this declaratory judgment action, UCB, Inc. sued Yeda Research and Development Co. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , r e- questing a declaration that UCB’s Cimzia® brand anti- body does not infringe Yeda’s U.S. Patent No. 6,090,923 (“the ’923 Patent”) ; UCB also sought a declaration that the ’923 Patent i s invalid. Yeda counterclaimed for i n- fringement.