Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

U.S. Water Services, Inc. v. Novozymes A/S, No. 15-1950 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2016)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1950
Also Docketed
No. 15-1967 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
December 15, 2016
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

U.S. Water Services, Inc. and Roy Johnson (together, “U.S. Water”) sued Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. (together, “Novozy mes”) in the U .S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (“District Court”), alleging indirect infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,415,137 (“the ’137 patent”) and 8,609,399 (“the ’399 patent”) (together, “ the Patents-in-Suit”). Novozymes counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of noninfring e- ment, invalidity, and inequitable conduct. The parties later filed cross -motions for summary judgment.