Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Intendis GmbH v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 15-1902 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1902
Decided
May 16, 2016
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case arises under the Hatch –Waxman Act, 1 and involves Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA ’s (collectively, “Glenmark”) 2 proposed generic version of Finacea® Gel, a topical med i- cation for various skin disorders. Glenmark appeals the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ’s final judgment entered in favor of Intendis GmbH , In- traserv GmbH & Co. KG, and Bayer HealthCare Pharma- ceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Appellees” ). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.