Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot S.A., No. 15-1892 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 29, 2016)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1892
Also Docketed
No. 15-1955 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 29, 2016
Judge
Schall, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Parrot, S.A. and Parrot, Inc. (collectively, “Parrot”) appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania that awarded Drone Technologies, Inc. (“Drone”) damages for Parrot’s infringement of two patents owned by Dron e as assignee and that also awarded Drone attorne y fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 and Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Drone Techs., Inc. v. Parrot S.A., No. 14CV0111, 2015 WL 3756318, at *1, * 14 (W.D. Pa. June 12, 2015).