Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 15-1854 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1854
Decided
March 17, 2017
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Bayer appeals the district court’s award of attorney fees to Dow under 35 U.S.C. § 285. The district court awarded attorney fees to Dow upon finding that the case stood out from others and was thus exceptional. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the case exceptional and awarding fees, we affirm. BACKGROUND This is the second appeal to our court in this patent infringement lawsuit between plaintiffs-appellants Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer S.A.S. (collectively, “Bayer”) and defendant -appellee Dow AgroSciences LLC .