E.I. du Pont de Nemours v. MacDermid Printing Solutions, No. 15-1777 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (“DuPont”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting summary judgment that claims 1, 6, 22, 30, 33, 36, 39 –41, and 48 of U.S. Patent 6,773,859 (“the ’859 patent”) are invalid as obv i- ous, and that claims 1, 3 –4, and 7– 8 of U.S. Patent 6,171,758 (“the ’758 patent”), as construed by the district court, were not infringed by MacDermid Printing Sol u- tions, L.L.C. (“MacDermid”). See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. MacDermid Printing Sols., L.L.C. , No.