Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated, No. 15-1428 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1428
Decided
February 9, 2016
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Rosebud LMS Inc. appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Adobe Systems Inc. was not liable for pre -issuance damages under 35 U.S.C. § 154(d) because it had no actual notice of the published patent application that led to asserted U.S. Patent No. 8,578,280. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND Rosebud has filed three suits against Adobe for patent infringement. Rosebud first sued Adobe for infringing U.S. Patent No.