Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

MAG Aerospace Industries, Inc v. B/E Aerospace, Inc., No. 15-1370 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 23, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1370
Also Docketed
No. 15-1426 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
March 23, 2016
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

These appeals concern vacuum toilets, such as those that are commonly found on commercial aircrafts. Plain- tiff-Appellant MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC (“MAG”) sued B/E Aerospace (“B/E”) , alleging infringement of U .S. Patent Nos. 6,536,054 (“ ’054 patent”), 6,536,055 (“ ’055 patent”), an d 6,353,942 (“ ’942 patent”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district court granted summary judgment of noni n- fringement on all patents, from which MAG timely a p- peals.