Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Intl., No. 15-1329 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This appeal follows a ten-day jury trial in the District of Delaware that resulted in verdicts that (1) Power Integrations Inc.’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,110,270 and 7,834,605 were neither anticipated nor obvious and were not directly or indirectly infringed by Fairchild Semicon- ductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Co r- poration, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation (collectively, Fairchild); (2) Power Integrations’ U.S. Patent Nos.