Indacon, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., No. 15-1129 (Fed. Cir. June 6, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Following the district court’s claim construction order, Indacon, Inc. and Facebook, Inc. stipulated to noni n- fringement, and the district court entered final judgment in favor of Facebook. In dacon appeals, disputing the district court’s construction of several claim terms. B e- cause the district court correctly construed the claim terms “alias,” “custom link,” “custom linkin g relatio n- ship,” and “link term,” we affirm. BACKGROUND Indacon owns U.S. Patent No.