Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Rembrandt Vision Techs., L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, No. 15-1079 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2016)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1079
Decided
April 7, 2016
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. (“Rembrandt”) appeals from the district court’s denial of Rembrandt’s motion for a new trial under Federal Rule s of Civil Proce- dure 60(b) (2) and (3). Because the district court abused its discretion in denying Rem brandt’s Rule 60(b)(3) m o- tion, we reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND This case returns to us following an unusual set of circumstances. Rembrandt sued Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.