Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Integrated Technology Corp. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc., No. 14-1820 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2015)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1820
Decided
October 21, 2015
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On appeal for the second time, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Mariner Acquisition Company L LC (collectively “Rudolph”) challenge the district court’s determinations that this case is exceptional and that Rudolph is bound by an earlier stipulation regarding the amount of attorneys’ fees it owes. We affirm the district court’s exceptionality finding, but we hold that the district court erred in inte r- preting the stipulation to be bindi ng in this circumstance.