Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Gator Tail, LLC v. Mud Buddy LLC, No. 14-1747 (Fed. Cir. June 22, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1747
Also Docketed
No. 14-1748 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 22, 2015
Judge
Clevenger, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Gator Tail, LLC appeals the decision of the district court that the asserted patents are invalid as obvious, for lack of written description, and as indefinite. Broussard v. Go-Devil Mfg. Co. , 29 F. Supp. 3d 753, 757 (M.D. La. 2014). This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) (2012). Because the district court’s conclusion that the asserted claims are obvious was supported by factual findings that are not clearly erroneous, we affirm. I This case concerns United States Patent Nos.