Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Automated Merchandising v. Lee, No. 14-1728 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1728
Decided
April 10, 2015
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. (AMS) peti- tioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office to terminate four pending inter partes reexaminations of four AMS patents that had been the subject of a patent - infringement suit between AMS and Crane Co. , the requester of the reexamination s. After AMS and Crane entered into a consent judgment , which dismissed the infringement suit and stated that the parties stipulated to the validity of the patents , AMS argued to the PTO that the reexaminations must stop because, under 35 U.S.C.