Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Smith & Nephew Incorporated v. Arthrex, Incorporated, No. 14-1691 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1691
Decided
March 18, 2015
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Smith & Nephew, Inc. (S&N) sued Arthrex, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,601,557 in January 2004. In 2009, we affirmed a summary judgment rejec t- ing the invalidity challenge but required a new infring e- ment trial because of an error in the initial claim construction. In 2013, reversing a JMOL that had been entered in Arthrex’s favor, we reinstated a jury verdict finding that Arthrex had infringed the ’557 patent.