Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Dome Patent L.P. v. Lee, No. 14-1673 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1673
Decided
September 3, 2015
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Dome owns a patent for making contact-lens material. On reexamination, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found that the claimed method at issue was obvious and therefore unpaten table. The district court agreed with the Patent Office that the claimed method was unpaten t- able. On appeal, Dome challenges both the standard of review employed by the district court and the court’s ultimate conclusion on obviousness.