Dome Patent L.P. v. Lee, No. 14-1673 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2015)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Dome owns a patent for making contact-lens material. On reexamination, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office found that the claimed method at issue was obvious and therefore unpaten table. The district court agreed with the Patent Office that the claimed method was unpaten t- able. On appeal, Dome challenges both the standard of review employed by the district court and the court’s ultimate conclusion on obviousness.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error