Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Transweb, LLC v. 3M Innovative Properties, No. 14-1646 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1646
Decided
February 10, 2016
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

3M sued TransWeb for infringement of several p a- tents. TransWeb sued for declaratory judgment of inv a- lidity and non -infringement of the patents. A jury found the patents to be invalid based on TransWeb’s prior public use of the patented method. In accordance with an adv i- sory verdict from the jury, the district court found the patents unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. The jury also found 3M to be liable for a Walker Process anti- trust violation and that attorney fees were an appropriate antitrust remedy.