ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 14-1612 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 2, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ParkerVision seeks rehearing of our decision affir m- ing the judgment of non-infringement as a matter of law. We deny the petition. In the panel opinion, we agreed with the district court that Dr. Prucnal’s admission that the baseband signal is created at the output of the mixer and before the storage capacitor is fatal to ParkerVision’s infringement case. ParkerVision contends that we misinterpreted Dr.