Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Alexsam, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc., No. 14-1564 (Fed. Cir. June 16, 2015)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1564
Also Docketed
No. 14-1705 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 16, 2015
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Please make the following changes: On page two, first paragraph, line 11, change “patents-in- suit” to “claims-in-suit”. On page seven, second paragraph, line 4, change “patents- in-suit” to “claims-in-suit”. On page nine, last paragraph before sub heading A, lines 3–7, replace the sentence ALEXSAM, INC. v. THE GAP, INC. 2 First, we consider whether there is substantial evidence such that the jury could find the SVS system was reduced to practice before July 10, 1997—the filing date of Mr. Dorf’s patent a p- plication—and is therefore prior art.