Cardpool, Inc. v. Plastic Jungle, Inc., No. 14-1562 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cardpool, Inc., appeals the ruling of the United States District Court for the North ern District of California, denying the joint motion of Car dpool and Plastic Jungle , Inc. to vacate the district court’s judgment 1 of patent invalidity insofar as the judgment was with prejudice .2 The parties’ stated reason for the requested vacatur was that all of the Cardpool patent claims had been replaced on reexamination, and that Plastic Jungle (now operating as Card Flo, Inc.) was no longer conducting the accused infringing activities. Cardpool Dist. Dk.