Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc., No. 14-1469 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2018)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1469
Also Docketed
No. 14-1504 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 6, 2018
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Medicines Company appeals findings of no i n- fringement made by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Hospira cross -appeals the district court’s finding that a d istribution agreement did not constitute an invalidating “offer for sale” under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). We af firm the district court’s noni n- fringement findings and remand the case for the district court to determine whether the on-sale bar applies. I The Medicines Company owns U.S. Patent Nos. 7,582,727 and 7,598,343.