Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Warner Chilcott Company, LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 14-1439 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1439
Decided
November 18, 2014
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In these consolidated appeals, Warner Chilcott Co m- pany, LLC (“Warner”) and Hoffmann- La Roche Inc. (“Roche”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Delaware granting summary judgment that claims 6, 8, 9, and 13– 15 of U.S. Patent 7,192,938 (the “’938 patent”) and claims 9 and 10 of U.S. Patent 7,718,634 (the “’634 patent”) (collectively, “the asserted claims”) were invalid for obviousness . Se e Warner Chilcott Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. , __ F. Supp. 2d __, No.