Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Kaneka Corporation v. Xiamen Kingdomway, No. 14-1373 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2015)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1373
Also Docketed
No. 14-1399 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 10, 2015
Judge
Reyna, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Kaneka Corporation sued Defendants Xiamen Kin g- domway Group Company, Pacific Rainbow International Inc., and Shenzhou Biology and Technology Co., L td., in the Central District of California, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 (the ’340 Patent) . The district court granted s ummary judgment of noninfringement based on the district court’s claim construction . Kaneka appealed. For the reasons that follow , we affirm-in-part, vacate-in-part, and remand. B ACKGROUND Coenzyme Q10 exists in animal cells.