Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Metso Minerals Inc. v. Terex Corporation, No. 14-1352 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 3, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1352
Decided
December 3, 2014
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Metso Minerals, Inc. (“Metso”) appeals a district court award of bond premium costs to defendants Powerscreen International Distribution Limited (now known as Terex GB Limited), Terex Corporation, Powerscreen New York, Inc., and Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Powerscreen”). Because the award of bond premium costs was not precluded by this court’s manda te in the prior appeal, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding those costs, we affirm.