Metso Minerals Inc. v. Terex Corporation, No. 14-1352 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 3, 2014)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Metso Minerals, Inc. (“Metso”) appeals a district court award of bond premium costs to defendants Powerscreen International Distribution Limited (now known as Terex GB Limited), Terex Corporation, Powerscreen New York, Inc., and Emerald Equipment Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Powerscreen”). Because the award of bond premium costs was not precluded by this court’s manda te in the prior appeal, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding those costs, we affirm.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error