Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Teashot.Llc v. Green Mountain Coffee Roaster, No. 14-1323 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 5, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1323
Decided
January 5, 2015
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Teashot.LLC (“Teashot”) appeals from a final jud g- ment of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado of non -infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,895,672 (“’672 patent”) in favor of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig, Inc., and Starbucks Corp. (collectively, “Green Mountain”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND I. Patent The ’672 patent seeks to adapt prior art coffee pod machines to make tea without the attendant weak taste from the short brewing time. ’672 patent col. 1 l. 63–col. 2 l. 19.