Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Oplus Technologies, Ltd. v. Vizio, Inc., No. 14-1297 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2015)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1297
Decided
April 10, 2015
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Vizio, Inc. appeals from the district court’s denial of attorneys’ and expert witness fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and the court’s inherent power. We hold that the district court abused its discretion in den y- ing fees, and thus vacate and remand. BACKGROUND Oplus Technologies, Ltd. originally filed this patent infringement suit in the Northern District of Illinois against Vizio and Sears Holding Corporation. T he North- ern District of Illinois granted defendants’ motion to transfer the case to the Central District of California.