Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 14-1275 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1275
Decided
August 4, 2015
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Sandoz Inc. (“Sandoz”), Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pha r- maceuticals, Inc. ( collectively, “Lupin”), and Hi -Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. (“Hi-Tech”) (collectively, “the Appe l- lants”)1 appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas , following a bench trial, which held that the claims of U.S. Patents 7,851,504 ( the “ ’504 patent”), 8,278,353 ( the “ ’353 p a- tent”), 8,299,118 (the “ ’118 patent”), 8,309,605 ( the “ ’605 patent”), and 8,338,479 ( the “ ’479 patent”) , asserted by Allergan, Inc.