Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, No. 14-1274 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2015)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1274
Also Docketed
No. 14-1276, No. 14-1277, No. 14-1278 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
November 10, 2015
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs-appellants Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz Inc. (collectively, “Momenta”) appeal the district court’s decision finding Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. (“Teva”) does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,575,886 (“ the ’886 patent”). In a companion case, Mo- menta appeals the district court’s decision finding A m- phastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., International Medication Systems, Ltd., Actavis, Inc., and Actavis Pharma, Inc. (collectively, “Amphastar”) do not infringe the ’886 patent.