Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc., No. 14-1205 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Ponani Sukumar and Southern California Stroke R e- habilitation Associates, Inc. (collectively, “Sukumar”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judg- ment for Nautilus, Inc. (“Nautilus”). The district cou rt held that Sukumar had not suffered “competitive injury” necessary to have standing to assert a false marking claim. See 35 U.S.C. § 292(b). The district court also granted summary judgment on Sukumar’s state law unfair competition claims. We affirm. I.