Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Cardsoft, LLC v. VeriFone, Inc., No. 14-1135 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 2, 2015)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1135
Decided
December 2, 2015
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court. In Card Soft v. VeriFone, Inc., 769 F.3d 1114 (Fed. Cir. 2014), we decided an appeal by defendant -appellants (collectively, VeriFone) from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In construing the patent claims, t he district court adopted plaintiff-appellees’ (collectively, CardSoft’s) proposed construction for the claim term “virtual machine .” Apply- ing the district court’s construction, a jury returned a verdict for CardSoft .