Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-1117 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1117
Decided
July 10, 2014
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Ms. Muffin Faye Anderson appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington dismissing her compliant for failure to state a claim of infringement of U.S. Patent No. D401,328 (the ’328 patent) . Because Ms. Anderson identifies no errors in the court’s decision, we affirm. BACKGROUND Ms. Anderson, acting pro se, sued Kimberly -Clark Corporation for infringement of the ’328 patent. 1 Ms. Anderson applied for the ’328 patent in September 1997.