Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Bard Peripheral Vascular v. W.L. Gore & Associates, No. 14-1114 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1114
Decided
January 13, 2015
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (“Gore”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona of willfulness in the infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,436,135 (“’135 patent”). For the reasons stated below, we affirm. I This dispute began with the filing of the 1974 patent application from which the ’135 patent eventually i s- sued—twenty-eight years later.