Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

H-W Technology, L.C. v. Overstock.com, Inc., No. 14-1054 (Fed. Cir. July 11, 2014)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1054
Also Docketed
No. 14-1055 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 11, 2014
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

H-W Technology, L.C., (“H -W”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Overstock.com, Inc., (“Overstock”). Specifica l- ly, H-W challenges the district court’s holding that claims 9 and 17 of H -W’s U.S. Patent No. 7,525,955 (“’955 p a- tent”) are invalid. We conclude that the district court correctly held claim 17 invalid but erred to the extent it held corrected claim 9 invalid.