Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Robert Bosch, LLC v. Snap-On Incorporated, No. 14-1040 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2014)

Affirmed
Indefiniteness Claim Construction
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1040
Decided
October 14, 2014
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Bosch, LLC (“Bosch”) a p- peals the decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan holding that all claims in U.S. Patent No. 6,782,313 (“’313 patent”) are invalid as indefinite. See Robert Bosch LLC v. Snap- On, Inc., No. 12 -11503, 2013 WL 4042664 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 9, 2013). We agree with the district court that the terms “program recognition device” and “program loading de- vice” invoke 35 U.S.C.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error